Hancock v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1DissentChristian, J.
The majority opinion holds that Martha Hancock was a passenger or guest in the car and that the well settled rule of law applicable to her is, where a passenger is in a private vehicle by invitation and is exercising no control over the driver, and is injured through the combined negligence of the driver and a third person, the negligence of such driver cannot be imputable to the passenger. If precluded from recovery it must be because of his own independent negligence. Virginia Railway and Power Company v. Gorsuch, 120 Va. 655, 91 S. E. 632, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 838; Virginian Railway Company v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Washington & Old Dominion Railway Co. v. Zell's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Director General v. Pence's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Virginia & Southwestern Railway Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.