Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kreutz v. Jacobs

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 11, 1976No. 74-414Published

1DissentJustice Stouder

I do not agree with the majority for I believe its holding represents a serious inroad on the extent to which partners may rely on settlements made with one another respecting unliquidated claims. The majority opinion permits a partner, after accepting a payment in full satisfaction of all partnership claims, to avoid that settlement without pleading or proving fraud or deception. Although conceding that partners may effect an accord and satisfaction, as other creditors and debtors may do, the majority opinion undermines that principle by holding that no accord and satisfaction occurred here.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day-Luellwitz Lumber Co. v. SerrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  2. Janci v. CernyIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Reed v. EngelIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Danks v. Kropp Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API