Livick v. Piqua State Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Woodson district court; Oscar Foust, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
Porter, J.:
Plaintiff sued and recovered judgment against the bank for $100 damages and $25 attorney’s fees under the provisions of section 5202 of the General Statutes of 1909, based upon the refusal of the bank to enter satisfaction of a mortgage upon real property.
The defendant’s appeal involves but a single question. The defendant claims that the provision of this section of the statute which authorizes the mortgagor to recover from the mortgagee $100 damages and a reasonable attorney’s fee is unconstitutional. It is insisted that the statute is in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rld. v. State ex rel. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Tucker v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mathews v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919