Legal Opinion

Dietler v. Kincannon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The original bill in this cause was filed by the complainant, E. N. Dietler, trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Browne & Borum Company, a corporation engaged in the business of heating, wiring*, and plumbing, against the defendants, constituting the State board of education, and the president of the West Tennessee State Normal School at Memphis, seeking to recover of them in their official capacities, and also in their individual capacity, an alleged indebtedness due Browne & Borum Company, as a balance on account for labor and materials furnished in improving and repairing the heating,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Board of Liquidation v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Flournoy v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Rolston. v. Missouri Fund CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Farrelly v. ColeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Lamb v. State Ex Rel. KisabethTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Fritts v. LeechTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Benson v. Hardin CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Reagan v. Fentress CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API