Larracuenta R. Panfil v. Ralph E. Fell
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
Larracuenta R. Panfíl (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s February 7, 2014 order terminating the obligation of Ralph E. Fell (“Father”) to pay post-secondary educational expenses for K.F. (“Daughter”) and the court’s denial of Mother’s motion to correct errors. Mother raises two issues which we revise and restate as whether the court erred or abused its discretion in entering the February 7, 2014 order and denying her motion to correct errors. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Mother and Father were married on June 3, 1989, and two children were born of the marriage,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. CharlesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karen B. Salser v. Gregg A. SalserIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Karen B. Salser v. Gregg A. SalserIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017