Legal Opinion

PEMBROOK v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 24, 2008No. 4D08-3538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Joseph Pembrook appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the denial of three of Pembrook’s four claims which improperly attempted to go behind his plea and raise known issues that were waived by entry of the plea. See Stano v. State, 520 So.2d 278 (Fla.1988); Gidney v. State, 925 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Pembrook’s allegations that counsel coerced him to enter a plea and that he wanted to go to trial are conclusively refuted by the record. The transcript of the plea hearing shows that counsel urged Pembrook…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Stano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Iacono v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Gidney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nettles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API