Legal Opinion
Demario Jones v. Federal Express Corporation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 4, 2020No. 2:19-cv-08429Unknown
1Opinion
Js 2 4 5 6 7 Ginited States District Court ° Central District of California 10 11 | DEMARIO JONES, Case No. 2:19-cv-08429 ODW(JCx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 1S v. REMAND AND DENYING AS 14 | FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, | MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS [22] 15 || et al.; 25] 16 Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Demario Jones seeks to remand this action to Los Angeles Cour 19 || Superior Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Mot. to Remand (“Mot.’ 20 || ECF No. 22.) Jones argues that Defendants Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx’ 21]; FedEx Corporate Services; Michael…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Padilla v. AT & T CORP.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.