Cade v. Bendix Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVILLE, Presiding Judge.
Did a referee1 of the Division of Workmen’s Compensation have authority to dismiss appellant’s claim for workmen’s compensation for want of prosecution? Surprisingly, this appears to be a question of first impression in this state. The following compendium of the facts puts the question in sharper focus.
On August 16, 1971, appellant filed a claim for workmen’s compensation against her employer, The Bendix Corporation. The latter and its insurer, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, are respondents herein. Appellant’s claim listed December 12, 1969, as the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First Presbyterian Church of Monett v. FeistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kramer v. Bill's Marine, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shelton v. Missouri Baptist Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Brewer v. Republic DrywallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Burkett v. Kansas City Missouri School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.