Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
In this case we return to our continuing struggle to define the perimeters of the Hancock Amendment and particularly of Article X, Section 22(a) of the Missouri Constitution. The specific issue is whether the respondent may raise its sewer charges without approval of district voters. The trial court held that respondent could raise its charges without a vote, relying principally on this Court’s recent decision in Keller v. Marion County Ambulance District, 820 S.W.2d 301 (Mo. banc 1991). A divided panel of the court of appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roberts v. McNarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Keller v. Marion County Ambulance DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mullenix - St. Charles Properties, L.P. v. City of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Zweig v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Missourians for Tax Justice Education Project v. HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Ring v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.