Murphy & Sons, Inc. v. DeSoto County Board of Supervisors
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Today’s case requires us to carefully consider the distinction between responsible bidders and responsive bids in the public-construction-contract arena. In general parlance, a responsible bidder is one who meets the appropriate and lawful qualifications to bid on the invitation. A responsive bid, on the other hand, is a bid that appropriately responds to the specifications of the invitation. Panola Construction Co., Inc. (Panola) and Murphy & Sons, Inc. (Murphy) claim the DeSoto County Board of Supervisors (Board) impermissi-bly and unlawfully combined these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jh Parker Const. v. Aldermen of NatchezCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
- Parker Bros. v. CrawfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Ryals v. Board of Supervisors of Pike CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Telcom Systems, Inc. v. LAUDERDALE COUNTY BD.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981