Legal Opinion

Robinson v. American Fruit Machinery Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1914No. 553PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by Henry Robinson against the American Fruit Machinery Company and another. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

This is a suit for an injunction and accounting based upon the complainant’s letters patent for improvement in vegetable paring machine, No. 942,932, issued December 14, 1909.

The defendant the American Fruit Machinery Company is charged with infringement in the manufacture and sale, and the defendant V. Clad & Sons, in the sale of potato paring machines, which the defendants admit by stipulation conform to the terms of claim 18 of the patent. The defenses are that the claim is invalid for want of inven*180tion and prior knowledge and use, and that if the claim describes a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Perkins Electric Switch Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  2. Anthracite Separator Co. v. PollockDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Fruit Machinery Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API