Legal Opinion

Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2002No. Nos. 99-35496, 99-35497, 99-36038 and 99-36131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The mandate is hereby recalled for purposes of disposition.

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision concerning the method for calculating attorney fees in cases of this kind and has remanded the matter for further proceedings. Gisbrecht *1159v. Apfel, 238 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir.2000), reversed and remanded by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002). We, in turn, remand the matter to the district court to conduct such further proceedings as may be appropriate in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. We consolidated these cases for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gary E. Gisbrecht v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Barbara A. Miller v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Nancy Sandine v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Donald L. Anderson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API