Legal Opinion

Mattock v. Goughnour

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District, Park County. Action for debt. The cause was tried before Henry, J. Plaintiff had judgment below.

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, C. J.

This is a suit for debt. There are two counts in the complaint, the first alleging an indebtedness for labor done and performed. The second is based on a due bill. This is the second appeal of the case. (See Mattock v. Goughnour, 11 Mont. 265.) The former appeal was taken from the entire judgment, as well as the order denying a new trial. This court reversed the judgment, set aside the order appealed from, and remanded the cause for new trial. At the second trial of the case in the court below the appellant sought and requested the court to confine the issues .to be tried to the first count…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. FuquaMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mattock v. GoughnourMontana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bank of Commerce v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Creem v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Welch v. NicholsMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Aldrich & Co. v. EllisMontana Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API