Legal Opinion

Goff v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 5, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 35 — ACTION BY R. A. HURST AGAINST G. P. GOFF.— Appeal from Breathitt Circuit Court. J. P. Adams, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Reversing.

R. A. Hurst brought this suit against C. P. Groff. He alleged in his petition that Groff had employed him to procure for him a purchaser for the timber on a tract of 1,076 acres of .land known as the Ware Cannel Coal tract, and had agreed to pay him $500 upon condition that he would procure him a- purchaser for *277the timber at the price of $10,000; that he procured such a purchaser who bought the property, and that Goff had refused to pay him the $500. Goff filed an answer in which he denied that Hurst had procured a purchaser of the timber, or that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman's Ex'r v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moran v. Moran's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Hearne v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Combes v. AyresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API