Legal Opinion

Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co. v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 9, 1977No. 601, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

The abrupt cessation of the policy of benign neglect in enforcing bail forfeitures, wittingly or unwittingly allowed by the State’s Attorney’s Office of Montgomery County, by failure to follow through on bail forfeitures, has jolted the bondsmen. This appeal arises from a combination of the State’s Attorney’s insistence upon payment of the forfeitures and the circuit court’s declination to recommend to the Governor a remission of the forfeitures either in “whole or some part thereof.” See Md. Ann. Code art. 41, § 50.

The case subjudice actually involves twelve (12) different bail bond…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irwin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KoreckySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. State v. CardinalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. State v. SabackSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  4. Professional Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Pantazes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API