Legal Opinion

Waits v. Orange Creek Turpentine Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 24, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

In December, 1932, Hayman’s Estate, Inc.; of Gainesville, Florida, leased to D. W. Matthews a large fract of land (about 16,000 acres) in Alachua and Putnam Counties. The lease was limited to the pine timber suitable for turpentine purposes and detailed the manner and specififications under, which it should be worked!. It ran for, ten years and Section 9 .provided for releasing any ,or all lands from its terms by giving sixty days notice and paying the amounts per cup face stated therein.

In March, 1933, appellee, Orange Creek Turpentine Corporation, by mfesnfe assignments came into possession…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carney v. HadleySupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  2. Cowan v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ENRIQUILLO EXPORT & IMPORT v. MBR Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Van Hoose v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. D'Lites of America, Inc. v. Zohar-Greenboim, Inc. (In Re D'Lites of America, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
  4. Hunt v. HilandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Carberry v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API