Legal Opinion

Forehand v. Fogg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 11, 1980No. 79 Civ. 4163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Petitioner Calvin Forehand applies pro se for a writ of habeas corpus. By Memoran dum and Order dated November 16, 1979, petitioner’s first, third and fourth claims for relief were dismissed, and the state was ordered to answer petitioner’s second claim and to produce relevant portions of the record within sixty days. On January 23, 1980, the court extended the state’s time to answer. On February 13, 1980, the state responded and submitted the record of the state court proceedings. On this record, it is now possible to assess petitioner’s second claim.

P…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Marion Knuckles, Rose Smith and Raymond BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Frank Wingate and Kenneth Luke SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Master v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API