Mueller v. Banking Commission

The question involved is much like that involved in In re Plain State Bank, ante, p. 257, 258 N. W. 783. The only difference is that in the Plain State Bank *510Case the stockholders claimed their voluntary assessment of one hundred per cent should be applied in satisfaction of their superadded stockholders’ liability because the Banking Commission advised them that it would be so applied in case the bank was thereafter closed. Here the stockholders claim that the assessments were paid on assurance by the bank cashier that the money paid in on their assessment would be kept separate until the…