Legal Opinion

Shattuck v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. of London

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1893No. 294PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Ih Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.

1Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law commenced in the district court of Hodgeman county, Kan., on the 3d day of December, 1891, by S. W. Shat tuck, Jr., the plaintiff in error, against the North British & Mercantile Insurance Company of London and Edinburgh, the First National Bank of Jelmore, Kan., and Frederick George. The complaint alleged, in substance, that the defendant insurance company verbally promised and agreed with Frederick George to renew a policy of'fire insurance for the sum of |2,700 on the latter’s stock of merchandise in Ms storehouse in Jet more, Kan., from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Express Co. v. Kountze BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Ward v. Blake Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. J. D. Bradley v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Tri-Cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Printing Pressmen And Assistants' Local 349Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Stonybrook Tenants Association, Inc. v. AlpertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  4. Tri-cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Local 349Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. NFC ACQUISITION, LLC v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API