United States v. Errol Eugene Washington
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSuhrheinrich, J., joined by Siler, J.,
JONES, J. (pp. 518-19), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
Since their inception in 1987, the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Sentencing Guidelines”) have engendered controversy. A major source of tension has been the 100:1 quantity ratio of powder cocaine to crack cocaine (“100:1 ratio”). The 100:1 ratio treats an individual who traffics in a given quantity of crack cocaine the same as one who traffics in 100 times as much powder cocaine. The United States Sentencing Commission (“Sentencing Commission”) and Congress have engaged in an ongoing dialogue…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Jan M. Sexton Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Sammye R. Holloway v. Sally Brush Clermont County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. KuehneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.