Legal Opinion

Matousek v. Bank of Europe Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The oral pleadings of the plaintiff declared on a breach of contract and for money had and received. The answer was a general denial.

The evidence shows that for sometime prior to October 7, 1929, defendant bank had been buying stocks for the plaintiff. Such purchases were made by the defendant through brokers. Payment would be made by plaintiff to the defendant which in turn would make payment to its brokers.

On October 7, 1929, plaintiff ordered defendant to purchase 500 *329shares of Southwest Stores, Inc. The defendant purchased through Sutro & Kimberley on October ninth. The cost, including…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terwilliger v. Ontario, Carbondale & Scranton RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Gelpcke v. . QuentellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Gelpcke v. QuentellNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. French v. Kensico CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API