Legal Opinion

Hilfiger v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1982No. Appeal, No. 178 C.D. 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

OpiNioet by

Judge Rogers,

The claimant1 in this unemployment compensation case has appealed a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review that she was ineligible for benefits because she had voluntarily left her work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §802(b)(l). We affirm.

The claimant worked for about seven and one-half months as an executive secretary of a public solid waste enterprise. Her last day of actual work was September 9,1980; she went on sick leave on September 10 until September 23,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Farley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API