Commonwealth v. Morgan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The defendant, who was convicted of rape, engaging in an unnatural and lascivious act, and assault and battery, argues four assignments of error. The circumstances relating to each assignment are set forth as we deal with it. There was no error.
1. The defendant’s first contention is that he was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial and to equal protection of the laws because the trial judge excused a woman juror pursuant to G. L. c. 234, § 1A. Over the defendant’s objection and exception, the judge advised each potential woman juror that she could be excused if she would be…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GallantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CarrionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.