Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Active Fabrics Corp. & Rosedale Fabrics Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1949Published

1Per curiam

We are unable to perceive misconduct on the part of the arbitrators. No request was made to postpone the hearing nor is there to be found any refusal to hear evidence pertinent to the controversy. In a court of law the proceeding would of course have been conducted in conformity with recognized rules of law and procedure. However, as the parties have adopted arbitration to settle their differences and as they have chosen judges of their own whose decision is to be final, they cannot be heard to complain if the result reached by the tribunal selected does not meet with their approval. (Matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Delma Engineering Corp. v. John A. Johnson Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Derma Engineering Corp. & John A. Johnson Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API