Legal Opinion
Young v. Tierney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 17, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered March 23, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was to compel discovery and inspection of certain documents relating to vehicles manufactured by the defendant Navistar International Transportation Corporation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The disclosure available pursuant to CPLR 3101 generally is left to the sound…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Silcox v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Breslauer v. DanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Cirineo v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kooper v. KooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lexington Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Assurance Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
- Wander v. St. John's UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Peculic v. SawickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.