Legal Opinion

Carlucci v. DEMINGS

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 19, 2010No. 5D08-3728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.

Kevin Carlucci and Susan Taylor challenge the trial court’s final summary judgment, ruling that General Order 328.0, as amended by Sheriff Beary, did not create a vested and enforceable contract entitling employees with twenty years of service with the Orange County Sheriffs Office (“OCSO”) to a fully paid lifetime health insurance policy. We affirm.

The OCSO employs general orders to provide employees with information and to establish internal guidelines and procedures. In 1998, Sheriff Beary 1 implemented a policy to defray the cost of health insurance for longer-tenured retirees by amending…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muller v. Stromberg Carlson Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co. v. MagahaSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Beggs v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Quaker Oats Co. v. JewellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Szell v. LámarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casequin v. Cat 5 Contracting, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  2. Dawn v. Nexdine HospitalityDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  3. Day v. Hernando CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API