Legal Opinion
Union Planters National Bank v. Bell (In Re Bell)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided November 22, 1985No. Bankruptcy Nos. 384-01433, Adv. Nos. 384-0440, 384-0443 and 385-0116PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The questions presented on these preliminary motions are whether Thomas E. Watts, Jr. (“Watts”) and Union Planters National Bank (“Union Planters”) have liens against the property which is the subject of this fraudulent conveyance action and whether those liens are subject to avoidance by the trustee. I find that both have perfected liens and neither lien is avoidable by the trustee.
This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(H) and (K). The following constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law. Bankruptcy Rule 7052.
FACTS
The facts are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saghi v. Walsh (In Re Gurs)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Cannon Mills, Inc. v. SpiveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Shepard v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Roberts v. FroggeTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Saghi v. Walsh (In Re Gurs)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of US Marketing Concepts, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Kreis v. Shope (In Re Ressler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- In Re AdamsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Lewis v. Diethorn (In re Joseph M. Eaton Builders, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Marvick v. Schneider (In Re Schneider)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.