Legal Opinion

Gauthney v. Shalala

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-1233PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BECHTLE, Senior District Judge.

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 1995, upon careful and independent consideration of the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, and after reviewing United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter’s Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

3. Defendant’s Motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and

4. The ease is REMANDED in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mandziej v. ChaterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Lippincott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  3. Rosa v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. MICKEVICH v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  5. Alker v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API