Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Marysville v. Standard Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1928No. 7868Published

1Dissent

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, and shall undertake to state my reasons therefor:

Section 7 of Ordinance No. 350 of the city of Marysville, the validity of which ordinance is here in question, provides: “This ordinance shall be in force 'and take effect from and after its publication in the official city paper.” It was published on October 11, 1923, and hence went into force and effect on that date.

Section 5 of this ordinance provides: “Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall upon conviction be adjudged…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API