Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
S.S. v. E.S.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 17, 1990Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
SHEBELL, J.A.D.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I am unable to agree with my colleagues on two aspects of their opinion. First, I would conclude that it is constitutional, reasonable and clearly contemplated under N.J.S.A. 9:17-51 that an order for blood or genetic testing of a party to a paternity proceeding may be made where the action is commenced by a verified complaint, that is, sworn and subscribed to before a person authorized to administer an oath. That is the case here; thus, to my view, it should be sufficient to satisfy the concern of the majority that there be “an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- State v. CarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Catena v. SeidlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Acceturo v. ZelinskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990