Legal Opinion

Bolitch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1990No. 939 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Judge.

This is a petition for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee denying workmen’s compensation benefits to Pauline M. Bolitch (claimant) based on claimant’s failure to give her employer, Volks wagon of America (employer), timely notice of claimant’s injury as required by Section 311 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act 1 (Section 311). We affirm.

Claimant worked for employer as an assembler. This occupation required claimant, in part, to reach overhead to straighten tires on automobiles as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beaver Supermarket v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Divine Providence Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. E.J.T. Construction., Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Paris Neckwear Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Split Vein Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Delaware County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. USAir, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Leber v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Kocher's IGA v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Brooks Drug, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API