Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sittingbear

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 17, 2001No. NMCM 98 01885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAUGLE, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of rape, unlawful entry, and adultery in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, and 934. The approved sentence includes a dishonorable discharge, confinement for seven years, total forfeiture of pay but not allowances, and reduction to the lowest enlisted pay grade, E-1.

We have carefully reviewed the record of trial, the appellant’s three assignments of error, and the Government’s response.1 We conclude that the findings…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  4. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TooheyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. InongNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  3. United States v. MazerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. MazerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  5. United States v. MacDonaldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API