Legal Opinion
Avery v. KANE GAS LIGHT AND HEATING COMPANY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 31, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-44, 74-58, 74-85, EriePublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
WEBER, District Judge.
In each of these three cases, the defendants have moved for summary judgment in their favor on the issue of the statute of limitations as a bar to the claims.
In Stuart B. Avery v. Kane Gas and Light Heating Company, Civil Action No. 74-44 Erie, all notes for which plaintiff claims judgment, attached to the complaint as Exhibits A-O, appear on their faces to be sealed instruments. Each note is signed by Fred M. Young, who was then both President and Treasurer of defendant Kane, to the left of the printed word “Seal”. All notes are dated sometime in 1960.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parsons Trading Co. v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Prestressed Structures, Inc. v. Bargain City, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Koleff's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000