Legal Opinion
Mercado v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 31, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated December 24, 1992, which, inter alia, denied their motion for leave to amend a notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) and to amend their complaint, and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs moved to amend their notice of claim and their complaint so as to correct the date on which the plaintiff *911Rosa Mercado allegedly slipped and fell due to a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adlowitz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Frankfort v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Simms v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Toro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pollicino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Archon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Davis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Torres v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999