T.K. v. State

We are asked to determine the propriety of the financial fate of T.K., one of five children involved in the burglary and ar*1198son of the Smith dwelling.1 Upon entering a nolo contendere plea to burglary of a dwelling and receiving a dismissal on the arson charge, T.K. was ordered to pay for damages caused to the house, garage, and contents. On appeal, T.K. argues that the court erred in ordering him to pay restitution on the full amount of damage caused by both offenses where the arson charge was dismissed. We reject this argument for several reasons.

First, T.K. did not raise this contention…