Legal Opinion
Temple v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1996No. 92-KA-01308-SCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
679 So.2d 611 (1996)
Ollie TEMPLE
v.
STATE of Mississippi.
No. 92-KA-01308-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
August 1, 1996.
George S. Monroe, II, Newton, for appellant.
Michael C. Moore, Attorney General, Charles W. Maris, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, Jackson, for appellee.
EN BANC.
BANKS, Justice.
This vehicular homicide case presents an evidentiary issue concerning admissibility of an interim digital display of alcoholic blood level by an intoxylizer when the test is not completed due to the failure of the defendant to blow long enough. We conclude that under the circumstances here…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Johnston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Peterson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- House v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Murphy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Bowman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BrannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rinehart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5677, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,115, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7883 United States of America v. Kevin Vincent BrannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hubert Milton Rinehart v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Hubert Milton Rinehart v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.