Legal Opinion

Widmeyer v. Faulk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1993No. 41A01-9212-CV-416PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Teresa Widmeyer appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Dan E. Faulk, D.D.S., entered in her medical malpractice action. She raises two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as: whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in Dr. Faulk's favor because Widmeyer failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Dr. Faulk's conduct fell below the applicable standard of care.

FACTS

Widmeyer's lower right molar needed to be extracted due to decay and periodontic problems.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Vergara Ex Rel. Vergara v. DoanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ogden Estate Ex Rel. Ogden v. Decatur County HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Chubb v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Malooley v. McIntyreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Syfu v. QuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Clanton v. United Skates of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Whyde v. CzarkowskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Slease v. HughbanksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Johnson v. WaitIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API