Legal Opinion

People v. Stier

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2008No. D051505PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

Two police officers stopped a truck for violating the Vehicle Code requirements for mud flaps and to investigate whether the backseat passenger was wearing a seatbelt. Before the stop, the officers had been informed by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents the vehicle had been involved in a narcotics transaction. After one of the officers found narcotics during a consensual search of the front seat passenger, the other officer ordered the driver to get out of the truck. Because of the driver’s height, the officer handcuffed the driver and then obtained the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Washington v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. People v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. C.B. v. Sonora School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  2. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. State v. CarrouthersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. The People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API