Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1915No. 9167Published

Before SeasE, J., Charleston, Action by F. S. Cannon against Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. From an order refusing to suspend the action, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. cites: Circuit Rule 60; 67 s! C. 463. distinguish 67 S. C. 463.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered

by Mr. Justice Fraser.

Appellant states his cause as follows:

“This action was commenced January 13, 1913. The defendant demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Circuit Judge, Judge Bowman, sustained the demurrer and dismissed the complaint. The case was appealed from Judge Bowman’s order and is reported in 97 S. C., page 233, 81 S. F. 476. The Supreme Court affirmed the judg-

ment of Judge Bowman, ‘with -leave, however, to the plaintiff to apply for permission to amend his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cannon v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API