Legal Opinion
Weedin v. Wong Tat Hing
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1925No. 4387PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
Section 6 of the Act of May 6, 1882 (22 Stat. 60), entitled “An act to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese,” as amended by the Act of July 5,1884 (23 Stat. 116 [Comp. St. § 4293]), provides that every Chinese person, other than a Chinese laborer, who may be entitled to come within the United States, and who shaU be about tó come to the United States, shall obtain the permission of and be identified by the Chinese government, ■ or of such other foreign government of which at the time such Chinese person shall be a subject, to be evidenced by a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cheung Sum Shee v. NagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haff v. Yung PoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Foo v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Dang Foo v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Yee Si, Also Known as Yee Suey v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Kwan Shun YueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.