Legal Opinion

Quincy Oil, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1980No. Nos. 1-5, 3-21 and 5-43PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZNER, Judge.

These three cases have been consolidated on appeal because they raise similar questions concerning this court’s limited statutory jurisdiction and the doctrine of mootness.

*892In Quincy Oil, Inc. v. FEA, 468 F.Supp. 383 (D.Mass.1979), Quincy Oil, Inc. (Quincy) sought vacatur of a remedial order granted by the Federal Energy Administration (FEA) directing Quincy to repay purported overcharges to its customer Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant (Taunton), and also sought a declaratory judgment that the amount charged Taunton was in compliance with the Mandatory Price Regulations, 10…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Simmons Oil Corporation (A/k/a David Christopher Corporation) v. Tesoro Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. TullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. MGPC, Inc. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. James D. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API