Legal Opinion

Davis v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1918No. 9192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; R. P. De Graffenried, Judge. Action by Etha Davis, nee Hutton, against Alice R. Thompson and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

Etha Davis, nee -Hutton, instituted this action against J. S. Hopping and Alice Thompson to recover the possession of, and to quiet the title to, a tract of land situated in Okmulgee county, Okla., which was allotted to her as a Creek freedman. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for defendants, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. Hereinafter, for convenience. Eth-a Davis, where she is designated by name, will be called by her maiden name, Etha Hutton, and where not referred to by name will be denominated plaintiff, and the other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. BrakelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Perryman v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edmison v. CrutsingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Winsor v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. McHodge v. Tulsa Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API