Guilford v. Crandall
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Samuel T. Guilford against Cynthia Crandall and another to foreclose a mortgage. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
The firm of Crandall & Boynton, composed of William H. Crandall (husband of defendant) and Loren D. Boynton, on March 8, 1888, bought of plaintiff his stock of goods for $2,764.-67, paying in cash $500, and securing the balance of the purchase price by the note of the firm for $764.67, and a mortgage of said Crandall and his wife (the defendant) on real estate owned by him. On the 14th day of February, 1889, to further secure the same debt for the purchase price of said goods, Crandall & Boynton executed to plaintiff a chattel mortgage covering their entire stock, and also an assignment of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scofield v. . DoscherNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lovett v. German Reformed ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Pattison v. PowersNew York Court of Chancery · 1834