Fox v. Tuftonborough
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Petition, for a highway in Tuftonborough. After notice, tlio defendants appeared, and the petition was referred to the county commissioners, whose report, laying out the highway, the defendants moved to set aside. The objections to the report related to the form of the petition, the conduct of the commissioners and some of the favorers of the road, and the proceedings at the hearing before the commissioners.
Read the full summary
Petition, for a highway in Tuftonborough. After notice, tlio defendants appeared, and the petition was referred to the county commissioners, whose report, laying out the highway, the defendants moved to set aside. The objections to the report related to the form of the petition, the conduct of the commissioners and some of the favorers of the road, and the proceedings at the hearing before the commissioners. The court, allowing the petition to be amended, and, on the other points of objection, finding that, as a matter of fact, there was no irregularity that had any influence upon the…
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
The objections to the form of the petition, not having been made during the first four days of the return term, were waived (88th rule of court) ; and the statute (Gen. St., c. 207, ss. 8, 9) allows amendments, in matters of form or substance, in any stage of the proceedings.
The finding of the court, in matters of fact, is not open to exception. Patten’s Petition, 16 N. H.278; N. 11. Digest, Practice, V. (b).
Exceptions overruled.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Carr v. AshlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1883
- Brown v. WestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889