Legal Opinion
Reed v. Federal Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 12, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eiber, J.
On March 13, 1979, certain premises located on Market Lane in Clinton Corners, New York, and owned by the plaintiff Cherylan Reed, were destroyed by a fire which had been intentionally set or procured by Cherylan’s father, the coplaintiff, Russell Reed. At issue on this appeal, is whether Cheryl-an, the named insured under the homeowners insurance policies issued by the defendants, is precluded from recovering for the property loss to the insured premises, by virtue of the acts committed by her father. There being no ground to set aside the jury’s determination…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reed v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- McCarthy v. Collins (In re SPG of Schenectady, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- People v. StanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In Re Spg Of Schenectady, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987