Legal Opinion
Jones v. Mutual Fidelity Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 26, 1903No. 230PublishedCited by 28 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADFORD, District Judge.
The questions for determination arise on a demurrer by the Mutual Fidelity Company, a corporation of *509Delaware, to an amended bill of complaint brought against it by Calvin Jones and others, citizens of Tennessee, on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of the defendant who shall come in as parties complainant and contribute to the expense of the suit. The bill, among other things, alleges in effect that the complainants are creditors of the defendant and respectively are the owners and holders of certain certificates of investment and obligations of the…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Fuller v. VolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Fuller v. VolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Boatmen's Nat. Co. v. M. W. Elkins & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.