Legal Opinion

In Re the Care & Treatment of Emerson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 12, 2016No. 113503PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, J.:

On October 24, 2000, a jury determined Cecil Emerson was a sexually violent predator. His appointed counsel filed a timely notice of appeal but failed to file a brief, thus Emerson’s appeal was dismissed. Nearly 12 years later, the district court granted Emerson’s motion to file a direct appeal out of time. This case asks whether we have the power to hear Emerson s untimely appeal and, if so, whether the jury’s verdict finding him to be a sexually violent predator should be upheld. We answer both questions in the affirmative.

Procedural background

Emersons trial

In August of 1999,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Care & Treatment of DominguezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. In re Care & Treatment of EmersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API