In Re the Care & Treatment of Emerson
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, J.:
On October 24, 2000, a jury determined Cecil Emerson was a sexually violent predator. His appointed counsel filed a timely notice of appeal but failed to file a brief, thus Emerson’s appeal was dismissed. Nearly 12 years later, the district court granted Emerson’s motion to file a direct appeal out of time. This case asks whether we have the power to hear Emerson s untimely appeal and, if so, whether the jury’s verdict finding him to be a sexually violent predator should be upheld. We answer both questions in the affirmative.
Procedural background
Emersons trial
In August of 1999,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Care & Treatment of DominguezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- In re Care & Treatment of EmersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017