Legal Opinion

Lusinski v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 9, 1985No. 84-1588PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This appeal arises from the third amended complaint filed by plaintiff, Dori Lusinski, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated, against defendants, Dominick’s Finer Foods, Inc. (Dominick’s), Jewel Companies, Inc. (Jewel), and all other entities similarly situated, seeking a refund of Illinois Use Tax paid by the plaintiff class to defendants on the stated value of nonreimbursable discount coupons 1 prior to September 30, 1980. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s third amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiff appeals.

In order to understand the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Getto v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hagerty v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Crane Construction Co. v. Symons Clamp & Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Isberian v. Village of GurneeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Geary v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Frank P. Randazzo, as Trustee for Frank P. Randazzo Declaration of Trust Dated July 18, 1997 v. Harris Bank Palatine, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. McIntosh v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People v. GrazianoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Freund v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API