Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 24, 1992No. 719, Docket 91-6268PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to'a consent decree entered into by the United States and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO (IBT), the IBT’s 1.5 million members were scheduled to elect, for the first time, their union leadership in a rank and file secret ballot in November and December of 1991. The campaign was the culmination of an 18-month election process supervised by court-appointed officers and conducted in accordance with election rules approved both by this Court and by the district court. See United States v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Jesus Perez GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992