Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kansas City v. LaRose

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 17, 1975No. 58599Published

1ConcurrenceSeiler, Judge

I believe it is implicit in the Kansas City ordinance that the hindering, obstruction, etc. of the officer be done wilfully and knowingly. Thus there is no conflict between the statute and the ordinance. I do not believe that a person would be guilty of violating the Kansas City ordinance and subject to fine or imprisonment if the person were unwittingly or perhaps carelessly to hinder or obstruct an officer in the discharge of his official duty, by, for example, accidentally or negligently getting in his way. A person might be driving through an intersection on a green light and fail to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McLartySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. State v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State v. BurgessMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. State v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API